bear-ing it since 72

bear-ing it since 72
bear-ing it since 72

Wednesday, 21 August 2013

Published Article

http://ukolympicweightlifting.co.uk/training/the-back-squat-does-it-have-a-direct-application-to-the-olympic-weightlifting-lifts-2/


The Back Squat - Does it have a Direct Application to the Olympic Weightlifting lifts?


I have debated the question of whether the back squat has any direct influence on the Olympic lifts. Now I must first say that I have only recently started to train the lifts but I have trained in the strength sports such as powerlifting, odd object lifting strongman etc for 20 years. I must also say that ninety percent of my training has been in my home gym in my power rack with a heavy barbell and to say that my passion is strength would be an understatement.

I must also say that I have squatted 200kg in my power rack and worked well above that number for top position partials and three quarter partials. To say that I love squats would be totally true. I always recommend to others who are looking for not only leg but full body strength and growth to squat.

However I took a devastating injury to my lower back while squatting with a warm up weight of 140kg that resulted in me been unable to walk, sleep or lie down for over a year. My doctors, physiotherapist and back specialist told me that I wouldn’t walk again but I ignored their gloom and got back on my feet and started training again.

Now funnily enough it was the squat with an empty steel bar that enabled me to come back and start hitting the heavy iron again after 3 years. So let me make it clear that squats are an excellent exercise and worth the sweat and brutality of training the movement, because there is nothing like the feeling of  a heavy loaded barbell draped across your shoulders and the sheer feeling of strength and power squats give you!

****************************************************************************
 
It seems to me that there is no direct correlation to how much a lifter can squat and how much they can clean & jerk or snatch.  But it seems that the majority of athletes or trainers are quite interested in how much they/you can squat. It reminds me of the question I use to hear in the 80’s and 90’s, which i still hear and that’s ‘how much do ya bench?’. It still makes me chuckle to this day because I don’t believe the bench press is a true barometer of bodily strength unlike the deadlift and squat.

Syzmon Kolecki, the Polish 94-105kg lifter claimed that his back squat was ‘235kg, while his clean & jerk was 232.kg’. (Kirksman,2013). Even the banned 2012 Albanian lifter Hysen said his front and back squat were 200KG, while his clean &jerk was 211kg and his snatch was 166kg. Now lets step back in time and have a look at what Paul Anderson the American 1950s lifter. He was reported to have a ‘squat of 548kg, (1206lbs) but his unofficial clean jerk was 218kg, (480lbs) and he regularly worked his snatches into the 136kg-170kg, (300-375llbs) range’, (American Strength legend 1998). Even John Davis another American lifter of the 1930s/50s had been reported to have a clean and jerk of 167.5kg and snatch of 135kg.

Now John Davis admitted in an interview 10 years before his death that in his early training career he did ‘no squats’  (Kilha, 1993). However he did also say that he went on an intense leg program and did many hours of ‘squatting in a rep range of 15 with 181kg (400lbs)’. (Kilha,1993), which helped his power tremendously. Now this is interesting because his squatting helped his strength to increase, which by my logic tells me that this strength increase helped his other lifts to increase. So its his strength increase that helped his clean and jerk and snatch and not the amount of weight he could squat. So straight away its possible to see from this example and others that the back squat shouldn’t be used as an indicator of how much a athlete can clean and jerk or snatch.

To help understand my logic I read an interesting article on the development of the squat for weightlifters and in this article the writer pointed out that 

‘If a weightlifter has a 80kg clean & jerk, and a 100kg back squat, if he increases his back squat to 120kg, then 80kg will represent a relatively smaller percentage of his maximal strength, and the weightlifter can now make the 80kg clean & jerk even if the lift is mechanically suboptimal.  Because of the relative lightness of the load, the lifter can make small corrections to position during the lift which he would not be able to make if the load were heavier relative to his absolute strength’, (Tyspkin, 2013)

So again I can say its strength gained through squats that allow the lifter to display his strength in his lifts. But again its clear to see that just because you can squat for example 100kg its quite clear that you will not be able to clean and jerk or snatch that weight. In my opinion a lifter should in theory be able to clean and jerk 80% of his or her back squat and if they cannot then they lack the efficiency, which is less than optimal. This is because the sport of weightlifting can be summoned up in three words ‘technique, technique, technique’, which by my understanding is the systematic procedure of accomplishing a complex task until its proficiently ingrained in the mind. So by trying to increase the back squat in a hope to increase the Olympic lifts will only result in a reduction in ‘efficiency and be detrimental to the lifters long term competition results’ (Tyspkin, 2013).

A question was posed to me, which relates to the above point of the reduction of efficiency, while writing this article and it was ‘what if you had a 16-17year old, who had the technquie ingrained in them but was weak?’ So my answer to this question would be to personally recommend that a good strength program was developed, which would inculde, core and flexablity work. The strength program would include the squat as well other moves like power cleans, clean grip & snatch grip deadlifts+power shrug etc  and it would use porgressive overload with decending rep range, i.e. 5x5 working down to 3x3 down to single reps training. This would enable the teen lifter to become strong over various rep ranges that allow a heavier load to be lifted over a 10 week cycle. So again the squat would be used as a leg and body stengthening move instead of using it to imporve the olympic lifts.

So if the load of the back squat has no direct relationship to how much the athlete can lift in his/her Olympic lifts and the load could have a disadvantageous effect on the lifters technical efficacy then what do you do?

Well back in the history of Olympic weightlifting around about 1924 at the Paris Olympic games the two handed press was introduced and in 1976 it was dropped due to controversy about how it was to be judged but the point I am trying to make is that we are weightlifters and our lifts that we are judged on and against others are the clean & jerk and snatch. So the back squat and other lifts are irrelevant and they should be trained accordingly.

So how would you train the back squat accordingly? Well it should be trained for pure leg and bodily strength as well as speed under the bar and it should be treated in the mind and during training as a separate lift having no connection to the affect on the Olympic lifts. 

The squat, for maximal strength, should be trained for speed to generate an explosive effect in the lower posterior chain, i.e. the glutes, hip flexors, hamstrings and lower back. In my mind I think that the load on the bar should be between 75%-80% of the 1 rep max for a rep range of 5 sets of 5 reps and over a 10 week cycle the percentages should be taken higher to around 90% to 100% and the sets and reps dropped to 5 sets of doubles or triples and even single reps if the lifter wishes to push his max 1 rep percentages to 100%+. An important quote that sticks in my head from powerlifter/trainer Louie Simmons of Westside Barbell is that ‘strength is measured in time not weight’, which is true, if you spend your training period and lift at 90% of your max your body will become accustom and strong at lifting 90% of your max load. But remember the key is to work on speed exploding from the bottom position of the squat to help acceleration and execution of strength. Also I think that the lifter should drop slowly into the bottom position of the squat so the de-acceleration and reversing the direction of the squat is slow and deliberate therefore emphasizing the negative of the movement.

Now I do understand that it is speed under the bar that’s the desired effect and one possible negative outcome for the lifter could result in been slow under the bar. However the mighty super-heavyweight Soviet weightlifter Vasily Ivanovich Alekseyev used a similar technquie where it allowed him to control the load on the way down, this was due to having to use metal weight plates and ‘he still used this way of training his squat when bumpers were available’, (Thibaudean 2007).

To futher back up my reasoning its important to understand that when the weight is lowered with less speed intramuscular tension is increased and this can be seen in competive bench pressing because ‘It has been shown that the best bench pressers in the world lower the bar to the chest at a slower pace’ (Thibaudean 2007) and then they expolde up to complete the lift.

So this could mean that if the proper tension is used during the eccentric, (lowering) phase of the lift and lifted up quickly this will lead to improved gains in strength. Again the drawback is if the load is moved down to slowly then the muscles will become over worked and tire quickly and the lifter will experince a loss of force on the upward proportion of the lift. Also if the lifter is back squatting in this style and still working his olympic lifts with speed then I think the negative drawbacks will be balanced out.

On a quick note I think the lifter should squat with his snatch foot position or his or her natural foot placement, while lifting in a high bar position. The reasoning for this is, in my judgement, that there will be a better carry over in strength from the squat to the olympic lifts and by using a high bar position it helps to impersonate the receiving portion of the snatch and clean.

So to summarize I think the squat is an excellent exercise and it should be used and trained hard. However it should be purely used as a pure leg and body strength exercise so the effects of the squat are about bodies growth in strength and leg power so the lifter becomes stronger in the body.


 

References

(Chinese Weightlifting System, (ANON), Back Squats are Not Necessary, (Online), Available online at  http://lifthard.com/back-squats-are-not-necessary/ (Accessed 20th July 2013)

American Strength legends, (1998), Paul Anderson, (Online), Available online at  http://samson-power.com/ASL/anderson.html (Accessed 20th July 2013)

Poliquin, C, (2011), The Strength Legacy of Strongman Paul Anderson | Poliquin (Online), Available online at http://www.charlespoliquin.com/ArticlesMultimedia/Articles/Article/768/The_Strength_Legacy_of_Strongman_Paul_Anderson.aspx (Accessed 20th July 2013)

Kilha, O, (1993), John Davis : A Tribute To Super Athlete (Online), Available online at http://www.chidlovski.net/liftup/a_john_davis.asp (Accessed 20th July 2013)

Tyspkin, J (2013) Squat Development for Weightlifting, (Online), Available online at http://www.jtsstrength.com/articles/2013/01/23/squat-development-for-weightlifting/ (Accessed 20th July 2013)

Thibaudean C, (2007), The Black Book Of Training Secrets, Francois Lepine

 

No comments:

Post a Comment